Tuesday, January 27, 2009

Still in Paris






I'm home now, in California, but I'm still in Paris, at least mentally. I'm going to continue this blog for awhile, working my way through the many thoughts and 1000+ photos, at least until I've repatriated fully into the USA. Lately I've been thinking quite a bit about the village of Bercy and how it represents so many French ideas. I've already included pictures of the Passarelle bridge linking Bercy to the hideous Mitterand library district, as well as pictures of the Frank Gehry building that now houses cinema expositions. Bercy, until the middle of the 19th century, was outside of Paris, and up until the 1970s it was best known as a wine processing district. To me it really helps illustrate how Paris is a series of villages, loosely held together. In France, deconstruction actually means something, unlike here in America, where it has become a pop cultural phrase denoting anything that is confusing or postmodernish. In French urban planning, though, deconstruction is an actual strategy. Urban spaces show the inherent contradictions that compose a city like Paris. Take, for example, the "village" of Bercy. The pictures today show how they have maintained public gardens and wooden bridges, amidst  glass structures and Frank Gehry's architecture. Over the village park looms the Palais Omnisport, a large glass and metal stadium wrapped in vertical grass lawn [and note the homage to I.M. Pei's Louvre pyramid, which in itself is an echo of Napoleon's 1798 Egyptian campaign). Like all of Paris, Bercy is a palimpsest, where past and present coexist--but they coexist because of public policy, and this coexistence strains coherence. I love this tension throughout the whole city. The Champs Elysee still has artifacts of its pre-revolution status as the place where aristocrats escaped the city, and the glory of the middle of last century gives way to modernization, as you can buy your Hermes scarf and then walk into a McDonald's for a Big Mac. Haussman's grand boulevards codified the bourgeoisie into the city, but it also created pockets of poverty which, over time, either became worse (the banlieues) or became priveleged for not being bourgeouisie (Montmartre, the Latin Quarter, etc.). Ok, too much rambling. By the way, the large taco seller statue was part of the Dennis Hopper exhibit in the cinema exposition hall located in the Gehry building. 

4 comments:

Anonymous said...

Jim,

Vous avez raison about deconstructivism in America, which is why Frank Gehry is embraced by the French and Germans for that matter. The French get the irony, the humor, the pure play of Gehry. Just like they got/get Jazz. They get the improvisation of Gehry like the improvisation of Bird or Miles. Have you seen the documentary film made by Gehry's friend the late great Sidney Pollack called Sketches of Frank Gehry? Anyway enough already, I am enjoying your blog and living vicariously in Paris a little bit every day. Keep the "postcards" coming.

David

Anonymous said...

Jim,

Vous avez raison about deconstructivism in America, which is why Frank Gehry is embraced by the French and Germans for that matter. The French get the irony, the humor, the pure play of Gehry. Just like they got/get Jazz. They get the improvisation of Gehry like the improvisation of Bird or Miles. Have you seen the documentary film made by Gehry's friend the late great Sidney Pollack called Sketches of Frank Gehry? Anyway enough already, I am enjoying your blog and living vicariously in Paris a little bit every day. Keep the "postcards" coming.

David

Anonymous said...

Jim,
Ok one more comment and then I have to get to work. I like you comment comparing Paris to a palimpsest. Hausmann with a big Pink Pearl eraser. I've heard the same label affixed to London a collection of villages. Charles Kuralt who lived in New York City said the same thing about New Your City. Also someone called Los Angeles a collection of suburbs looking for a city.

Jim said...

David,
I'm going to go look at Netflix for the Pollack doc. I tend to react viscerally and immediately to architecture, which isn't always a good thing. Perhaps my reaction is some vestige of that damn protestant work ethic that reacts against pure play. I'm not sure if America will ever be able to throw off the shackles of our puritanical founders. Regarding London--I've heard the same thing about it being a collection of villages, but it always seems a little harder for me to see those boundaries unless I head up to Hampstead Heath or turn a corner into Smithfield early in the morning before everything is lost in a haze of people. I think a lot of it has to do with the urban renewal plan that Hitler imposed upon them in the 40s. Thinking about LA, I'm hopeful. It may not have found a city yet, but the sprawling nature of the metropolitan area means that mid-Fairfax feels very different from Griffith Park or San Gabriel. Maybe LA is the truly deconstructed, modern city, not pretending to have some fictive center other than hollywood, which is so patently based on fiction that it can't even begin to cohere. Just wish it had good public transpo, though.